![]() The plot picks up from the end of the last one, with Red being hailed as a hero for rescuing Bird Island from the onslaught of the green pigs, who live on an adjacent island. The plot eventually leads to a combination heist movie/band of heroes on a military mission storyline, which is more conducive to kid-oriented slapstick and lets the project feel less ungainly and lighter on its feet (although there's still a fair amount of sexual humor that might be considered inappropriate, were there a chance small children would get it). The main character, Red ( Jason Sudeikis), was a belligerent, often physically violent individual, sentenced by a judge to undergo anger management training, a plot line you'd expect to see in a live-action comedy aimed at grownups (like, well, " Anger Management"), and a lot of the social satire, while welcome, surely didn't register on most little ones. The entire thing felt ungainly, and the required emotional catharsis at the end didn't quite feel earned. When available, proofs will be sent to the authors for evaluation and final approval.The conception of the original project was also odd, though perhaps no odder than that of most of other big-budget animated pictures aimed at families. Upon approval publication will be notified immediately to the authors and certification will be issued. They will also be subject to evaluation per linguistic in Spanish and English. They will the external peer reviewers opinions and always anonymously. Authors will be informed timeously of the different phases that are met in the process of editorial review. In case of discrepancy in opinions it will be sent to a third arbitrator, if necessary opinion of the member of the scientific committee will be requested. ![]() (3) Publish when substance and content corrections have been made. (2) Publish when they have complied with minor corrections. Peer reviewers verdict is done as follows. If the article is accepted because it fulfills the formal and content requirements exposed in these instructions is sent to two external academic peers who anonymously made suggestions and corrections. Initially the received items are subjected to a preliminary study by the director, editor or committee publisher who determines the appropriate structure of the paper and its relevance to the policies of the journal and the institution. ![]() The originals will be subjected to a process of editorial review to be fulfilled in several phases. If it is pertinent, immediately after, the acknowledgments to institutions or personnel that otherwise contributed to the article and / or the research, could be given. It must be also specified whether it has received money by way of funding, specifying the origins and codes of calls where they obtained the resources. The existence or absence of interest conflicts must be specified at the end of the article. The authors must admit and say when sending the paper if there is any interference or limitation of the financial backer with regard to the analysis and interpretation of the information, writing or manuscript submission. The second type of interest conflict is related to the financial backer of the research. The first one relates directly to the work authors and the financial and personal relationships that could influence or bias the manuscript in some way. ![]() An author of an article to be considered may be involved in two types of interest conflicts. head of school / department / research group that presents the paper). “Courtesy authors” identifications or designations will not be accepted if the researcher has not met the delineated criteria (e.g. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |